Future white soldier?
When Internet Nazis rail against the alleged evils of “race-mixing,” the particular kind of mixology that invariably enrages them the most involves white women “mudsharking” or “coal burning” with black men.
It’s no coincidence that the favorite alt-right insult is “cuck,” a term borrowed from cuckold porn, a subgenre that typically involves muscular, well-endowed black men having sex with white “hotwives” while their “cuck” husband watches.
Like the insult “cuck” itself, this kind of porn (by most accounts) is most popular amongst white men, and seems to spring from the not-very-well-hidden fear of many racist white dudes that black men are inherently more virile and masculine than them. For those who don’t share these insecurities, the “cuck” insult stings about as much as being called a doo-doo head.
But when it comes to white men “mixing” with black women, white racists have to more or less force themselves to care.
In a recent post on neo-Nazi tip sheet the Daily Stormer, Andrew Anglin attempts to explain — or at least rationalize — these divergent reactions.
When white women go “mudsharking,” racist white men feel
a lot of anger, because it’s OUR WOMB – that’s right, it doesn’t belong to her, it belongs to the males in her society – that is being used to produce an enemy soldier.
As Anglin sees it, his angry reaction to “mudsharking” is dictated by BIOTRUTHS.
[W]hen you see women with non-Whites, it’s a biological response that you’re having. It’s the same response that creates white knighting, and this whole idea of “women and children first.” Women’s eggs are infinitely more valuable than men’s sperm. So there is an inborn drive in men to constantly protect women. And when you see them with non-Whites, you immediately respond negatively.
But when white men date or marry or have children with black women, Anglin tells his readers, he doesn’t feel
triggered … because it doesn’t really make any difference, biologically. … Our race isn’t going to run out of sperm any time soon, so when it’s a man doing it, it’s just sort of like “lolwut?”
Bewildered by this “weird fetish,” Anglin speculates on the psychology of white men who marry black women.
[I]s it like, he’s so cucked that he feels like he’s gotta signal super-hard to show how much better he is than his peers by creating and raising a monkey child? Is it to seem more interesting? Maybe he’s playing the long game, so that like, in the future when his son is committing robbery and rape, he can be like “oh my god, it’s because of racism” and people will feel sorry for him?
Yeah, I’m sure that’s it.
But don’t worry, racists, Anglin is still against it!
Men who produce children with non-Whites should absolutely be mocked and ostracized. And it shouldn’t be legal. Although when we take over the system, it won’t even be possible, unless these guys want to fly to Africa to do it, because they’re all going back. But it doesn’t trigger the same visceral reaction when you see it, because in terms of the survival of the race, it doesn’t make any difference if some men go have kids with non-Whites. It is, however, gross and weird.
That doesn’t make a lick of sense. But rationalizations for racism seldom do.