Turns out that very few teenage girls want to be forcibly married to Nazis
It’s not exactly a shock to discover that Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer, the internet Nazi tabloid, thinks it’s just swell that a fellow white supremacist sucker-punched a female antifascist activist in one of the many melees that broke out in and around an alt-right rally in Berkeley yesterday.
“Nathan Damigo went to war Saturday, and he took out one of our top enemies,” Anglin happily declares in a Daily Stormer post today. “She came to fight and she got what she came for!” (Archived post here; mildly NSFW.)
Adding to Anglin’s evident delight: “[T]his girl was really small, which makes it even funnier.”
But if Anglin’s gloating over the punch is par for his particular course, what is a bit surprising is where he goes from there. After posting some old photos of the punchee that the not-so-good folks from /pol/ dug up after the incident yesterday, Anglin declares that “[s]he was a nice, sweet little girl as a teenager.” But now, he notes with a shudder, she’s a SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR with a nose ring and hairy armpits who’s not shy about showing her body in public.
And this, to Anglin, is a sign that we need to institute what he calls “WHITE SHARIA” to make sure no other white girls ruin their beautiful innocence with too much independent thought.
When this bitch was 15, you could genuinely say “Aryan princess.” She was glowingly pretty, I’m sure very sweet, giggly, would blush if you flirted with her – she was fit for a white analog to K-Pop.
But “freedom” and the university system turned her into a hairy porno monster rioting on the street.
Damn that freedom! Sorry, “freedom.”
The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them and by extension all of civilization itself.
Huh. I always thought that the notion of individual liberty was one of the best things about civilization, not a threat to its very existence.
Anglin has a rather old-fashioned solution for this pesky female freedom:
We have to forcibly marry-off teenage girls to men who will TAKE CARE OF THEM!
We WANT women to be taken care of, as they are the thing that cooks, cleans, gives sexual pleasure and produces and raises children! The white knights don’t care about the protection of women! White knights skirt their MASCULINE responsibility by refusing their biological duty to protect women in REAL terms, which mainly involves protecting them from themselves, rather than some external threat!
Apparently you “protect” girls and women by referring to them as “things,”punching them in the face, and forcing them into a lifetime of sexual slavery as unwilling teenage brides.
Oh, sorry, I’m just being a “cuck.”
People who are opposed to the policy of forced teenage marriage are cucks and feminists, who care not for the wellbeing of women, but simply for their own childlike emotions which have been stimulated by Jewish propaganda in Hollywood films about the independent minds of women.
And people can be like “OH YEAH OKAY BUT WHITE SHARIA IS TOO EXTREME THO” – in fact, the situation is now so extreme that we don’t have any choice anymore.
Nah. We have a choice. On one side, the “cucks” and the feminists and the alleged Jewish propagandists — all of those who share the weird belief that women shouldn’t be shotgun-married into submission. On the other side, Nazi shitheads terrified by women with nose rings and armpit hair and minds of their own.
Hey, I never said it was a particularly difficult choice. Just an important one.