The misogynistic doofuses who call themselves Men Going Their Own Way have some, well, intriguing thoughts about human biology.
Consider this proposal from a MGTOW Redditor called omino23, who thinks that human wombs could be used for much more than just making babies.
Yeah, ladies, stop bogarting all the wombs! We want to make some kickass iPhones! And maybe some awesome video game consoles that sort of might be alive, like the one from David Cronenberg’s eXistenZ:
(Note: Not all women have wombs and not everyone with a womb is a woman, not that this really seems to be a consideration to omoino23.)
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
It’s a We Hunted the Mammoth Trifecta, except with four things. A Fourfecta. (There’s probably a real word for that but I’m too exited to look it up.)
Anyway, so our boy DiceRollah recently paid a visit to the SemenRetention subreddit — an especially hardcore alternative to the anti-maturbation NoFap subreddit — and, sounding a bit like General Jack D. Ripper from Dr. Strangelove, shared his theories about men and their precious bodily fluids.
From my perspective, giving women our essence is one more way of many that they drain us. Literally.
Well, ok, but this particular process is at least more pleasurable than having one’s blood drained, either at the doctor’s office or via the more traditional succubus/vampire methodology.
Yet we go right on seeking them out. We may as well go to the club and say “hey baby, how about i allow you to take away my energy and motivation just so i can get laid?”
Worst pickup line ever.
It occured to me lately that regular sex is of course the same as jerking off from a physiological standpoint, and it leaves you just as uninspired and dead inside as habitual jerking off.
Uh, speak for yourself, dude.
I think this may be, from an evolutionary standpoint, nature’s way of making us placid and want to sit at home with that woman, our brains softened by the fucking, and protect her instead of being out there doing fantastic works of cave art or slaying woolly mammoths, which would thus attract possible rival females. My thoughts, anyway.
Huh. Maybe I should change the name of the blog to We Would Have Hunted the Mammoth if You Harpies Hasn’t Stolen Our Magic Sperm.
But I don’t think I will. Because it seems to me that DiceRollah’s theory has already been proven false. I mean, sure, we can’t test if semen-retaining dudes would be more inspired to hunt mammoths, what with the mammoths being extinct and all. But that thing about “doing fantastic works of … art?”
I did a search for “art” in the SemenRetention and NoFap subreddits. I found none in the former and, well, here are some examples of what I found in the latter:
I mean, sure, the Tupac drawing is at least recognizably Tupac. As for the rest, hey, if drawing or painting makes you happy, go ahead and do it. You’re not obligated to be a genius.
But it would be a bit of a stretch to call any of these works of art “fantastic.” So I think I can say that DiceRollah’s theory has been pretty clearly debunked. Which is good news for everyone who enjoys draining themselves, or being drained.
(Note: Whenever manosphere dudes talk about men and women generally, they are almost always referring only to cis men and women; that’s the case here.)
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
So have you heard of the “dogpill?” Apologies in advance for possibly ruining your dinner, or your entire day, but if you haven’t, the Dogpill is what incels call their, er, theory that many of the very same women who refuse to have sex with them are regularly, and enthusiastically, having sex with dogs.
And the incels aren’t joking. I mean, yes, they do joke about the dogpill on a fairly regular basis. but they also fervently believe it’s true, and many of them work themselves into a rage over it on an almost daily basis.
“These dogs have had more sex with human Stacy’s then any of us ever will,” an incel calling himself Blancmange recently complained on the Incels.is forums alongside three blurry pictures of dogs he apparently screenshotted from bestiality porn videos. He continued:
It’s a sad awakening when you realise that even dogs are getting Stacy’s in their prime…
These dogs aren’t smiling for nothing…and there are literally thousands more dogs getting it from young Stacys who would rather fuck a dog, even a shaggy muttly looking mongrel than a beta male human.
A rather startling number of incels, apparently unable to tell the difference between creepy fetish porn and real life, have convinced themselves that a significant portion of women regularly have sex with their dogs, if not exclusively, at least when their regular Chad is too busy fucking other women to stop by for a booty call.
“[E]very female that chose [sic] to get a dog and lives on her own is fucking that dog,” one Incels.is commenter has proclaimed. “And about 60% of girls that have a family dog have done something sexual with the dog.”
No incel ever cites any evidence for these sorts of assertions, because there is none. As I noted in a previous post, the only even-slightly reliable-seeming survey I found on the subject suggested that less than 2 percent of American women have ever had any kind of sex with any animal. But don’t tell that to an incel, because they’d rather believe that every woman they see is a secret dog-fucker.
“Anytime I see some single whore on instagram who is in her mid 20’s and posts pictures of her and her big ass dog together I have to imagine that dog is fucking her snatch,” an incel called bluecollarCEL tells Blancmange. “Unbelieveable.”
“[D]ogs are having more sex and loving relationships with human females than the average man,” another regular commenter on the Incels.is forums lamented.
“I used to think the dogpill was a meme,” still another wrote dejectedly.
But it turned out, it wasn’t a meme, it was real. … The dogpill is the literal ultimate pill, there is no further degeneracy allowed for a woman to commit …
At this point a man shall ask himself if there will ever be a turning back, or if the dogpill is the point of no return for a society, that is, that the moment you reach it, all hope is to be lost.
The regulars on the Incels.is forum not only believe the dogpill is real; they’re utterly obsessed with it, complaining about Chad dogs nearly as often as they complain about Chad humans.
But dogs aren’t the only animals the incels think are getting more girlie action than they are. If you poke around in the archives at Incels.is, you’ll find references to a astonishing array of animal-based “pills.” I’ve seen posts about such alleged “pills” as the Horsepill, the Catpill, the Donkeypill, the Monkeypill, the Camelpill, the Gorillapill, the Sealpill, the Dolphinpill, the Frogpill, the Chameleonpill, the Opposumpill, the Ratpill and, yes, the Fishpill. (Note: The Incels.is site is currently under a ddos attack, so I was unable to set up archive links for most of these and the links that follow; some lead to webcaches.)
Some of these supposed pills are little more than jokes. But others are taken as seriously as incels take the Dogpill — that is, very. And in some instances, even when the incels realize that there is no actual cross-species sex going on, they are still angry, and bitterly jealous, that women are paying attention to animals other than them, that women who would never touch them enjoy petting their pets.
So let’s look at some of these “pills” and what incels say about them.
The Horsepill
After the Dogpill, the animal pill that causes incels the most misguided concern is the Horsepill, which I wrote about in some (gross) detail here. Many if not most incels seem to believe that “[w]omen have always fucked horses,” as one Incels.is commenter blithely put it. But some think that the practice is getting more and more common as contemporary women (allegedly) get sluttier and sluttier. As an incel commenter called MilkTeaPill explained this theory in a post last year,
dog dicks aren’t big enough for foids these days. They need that BHD (Big Horse Dick). 1-2 feet of horse dick pounding their insides. …
They can’t get enough of that multi foot dick stretching out their human pussy. They love it when horses cum liters of horse seed into them. This is literally every foids dream. …
Horse dick is the new standard that is the point I was making. … Soon enough there will be horse get aways were hundreds of foids go to a ranch for a weekend to get HORSED.
Still, few think this (allegedly) widespread practice is quite as (allegedly) widespread as dog-fucking. As one more, er, moderate incel explained:
Dogs are more common because of their size and availability. Horse dicks are massive, very few women can take it. Usually older women, women who’ve given birth, and women who have properly managed to stretch themselves enough with toys. Pony’s are more common than actual horses but it does happen.
Yes, I’m sure your stretched-out grandma is regularly rolling in the hay with her favorite stallion.
The Catpill
Incels like to joke about young feminists ultimately turning into sexless “cat ladies” in their later years (after age 30 or so), but they’re also aware that quite a few of the women they’re actually attracted to own cats. And this makes them very, very angry.
While incels retain enough of a connection, however tenuous, to reality to know that the, er, mechanics of cat-fucking are such that very few of these cat-loving women are literally having sex with their cats, incels are still jealous the cats are getting physical affection from human Stacies. Some incels even manage to get mad about the hypothetical sex they think these women would like to have with their cats — or with the larger, more Chadlike, species of cats that typically live in zoos.
After discovering a video posted to Reddit of a woman, possibly sans clothes, snuggling in bed with a caracel, one Incels.is commenter groused that “[w]omen would rather fuck large felines than look your way.” When some female commenters online joked about wanting to marry a particularly majestic lion featured in a Facebook video, one incel posted their comments to Incels.is as an example of “RageFuel” because, as he put it, “[w]omen would rather have sex with this lion than with you.”
The Ratpill
When one incel came across a video of a “Stacey” petting and giving light kisses to her pet rat, the way some overenthusiastic pet-owners sometimes do, he quickly went and reposted the video on Incels.is as an example of “SuicideFuel,” titling his post “When a literal rat gets more action than you do.”
“Why do these never end?” replied another incel. “I wasn’t prepared to take this especially RN. Her facial expressions make me want to hit her.”
“[W]omen have no soul,” another concluded.
How screwed up do you have to be to get jealous of a literal rat?
The Sealpill
Even the mostly jokey animal “pills” are tinged with bitterness. When an incel calling himself, er, manlet cUnt ran across a photo of three attractive young women posing with seals in a sort of mock prom photo, with the seals’ flippers wrapped around them like a prom date’s arms, he posted the picture on Incels.is, declaring that
you know its over when literally a seal has had more physical contact with the opposite gender than you have.
Pretty sure that’s because the seal is a lot more pleasant to be around.
The Fishpill, a.k.a. “Hydrowhoring”
It’s weird enough to get jealous of rats and seals for getting more attention from women than you. It’s even weirder to get jealous of a fish being used as a dildo in a porn video. When “sealpill” inventor manlet cUnt found video featuring exactly this happening, he posted it to Incels.is with the note, noting that the fish in question “has more validation than you will ever get. “
“[A] fucking fish has more smv than me,” replied another commenter, “first dogs, now this. im one more suicide fuel vid from roping.”
I’m assuming he was at least mostly joking. But with these guys it’s never completely clear, since even the most jokey “animal” pills seem to leave a bitter taste in the mouths of those incels who post about them.
What on earth does all this mean?
While incels have been talking about women (allegedly) having sex with animals for years, discussion of the “dogpill” and other animal pills — from the jokey ones like the Fishpill to those, like the Horsepill, that many incels seem to take utterly seriously — has grown tremendously over the past year or so, and even more in the last few months.
As ludicrous as the Dogpill might appear to anyone outside the incel world. I have to take it as a sign of the movement’s increasing radicalization. On some level, I think, many incels realize that the rage they feel over their so-called “involuntary” celibacy is extreme, that many people endure long dry stretches in their romantic and sexual lives without wanting to murder the entire human race.
So incels frequently turn to “RageFuel” posts — generally emphasizing the alleged perfidy of women in general or some especially wicked woman in particular — not just to stoke but to justify their rage.
Animal pill posts are almost perfect “RageFuel” — providing convenient targets for rage in the form of women performing what most people would consider sexually depraved acts, while simultaneously allowing incels to wallow even more abjectly in their own self-pity as men so lacking in sexual appeal that women would rather have sex with literal dogs than with them.
Beliefs don’t have to be rational in order to provoke or justify violent action. The Pizzagate conspiracy theory is ludicrous nonsense, but it inspired a man to literally march into the Comet Ping Pong restaurant with an assault rifle and start shooting. Charles Manson ordered his followers to brutally murder seven people because he thought it would spark a race war that would ultimately put him in charge. The assorted conspiracy theories associated with QAnon have a bizarrely baroque complexity, virtually defying explanation. Yet QAnon followers talk about taking up arms if the mass arrests of alleged globalist pedophiles that Q has been promising don’ t take place sometime soon.
Could “the Dogpill” by itself inspire some especially desperate and unhinged incel to launch his own murderous assault on innocent women and men, a la the incel “martyr” Elliot Rodger? Unlikely. But it’s part of an evolving ideology that seems to get more radical by the day — and that has already led several young men to “go ER,” with tragic results.
So as ludicrous as the Dogpill “theory” is as a putative description of reality, it’s worth taking seriously as a symptom of increasing incel radicalism.
We live in strange times, and they’re just getting stranger.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
It’s not uncommon for aging libertines to have second thoughts about the casual hedonism of their youth. Neil Strauss followed up his 2005 book The Game, which brought the “pickup artist” subculture into the mainstream, with The Truth, in which he confessed that his celebrity as one of the world’s most famous PUAs had in many ways ruined his life and the lives of those around him. (Still, he didn’t return the royalties from his earlier book, as far as I know, or take it out of print.)
Roosh V, who had his own brief time in the spotlight as the world’s most hated PUA, has taken a similar turn in recent years, albeit with much less self-awareness than Strauss. Roosh once made his living with a series of self-published books offering country-specific tips on how to effectively manipulate women in Europe and South America into bed without getting arrested on rape charges.
Now he’s become a far-right moral scold, railing against the sexual “degeneracy” he once so enthusiastically promoted. (He still sells his Bang books though, and recently came out with his latest tome, imaginatively titled Game.)
In a recent post on his self-titled blog — which remains active even though he abandoned his more popular Return of Kings site a few months back — Roosh takes aim at contraception, blaming it not only for helping evil elites depopulate the world but also for destroying love itself, at least for the women using it.
Roosh begins by assailing contraception as a tool of conspirotorial elites bent on reducing the world population — something he thinks they also do by promoting such other alleged social evils as “homosexuality … feminism, transgenderism, and divorce laws.”
But he thinks that the effect contraception has on the female psyche is much more insidious.
Contraceptives allow virtually risk-free casual sex, an act that used to be the most intimate of intimates, reserved for only a husband or wife. Sex used to be a huge practical and emotional decision, on the level of buying a house.
Seriously! Just filling out the forms for a sex mortgage used to take hours!
Now, it is more like choosing which restaurant to eat dinner at, but even the latter takes more care as you check reviews and ask around to assess the restaurant’s quality. Now, men are ready and able to put their penises in any woman, no reviews needed, and it’s even worse that women have become just like men in having sex for the most fleeting of reasons based on their primal desires.
If the idea of women being able to have sex when and with whom they desire does not immediately cause you to run screaming in horror, Roosh helpfully spells out the terrible and irreversible damage that casual consensual sex can do to a woman’s “bonding glue.”
Her what, you may ask? Let’s let Roosh explain:
Before you think I’ve turned into some kind of sex puritan, it’s important to understand that we are all born with a set amount of bonding glue. This glue is required to connect with a member of the opposite sex for love that is practical or romantic for the goal of creating a family. Each episode of casual sex, which contraceptives enable (along with other medical advances like antibiotics that treat sexually transmitted diseases), permanently reduces the amount of bonding glue you possess.
Still unconvinced? Roosh tries another metaphor:
The best way to explain how bonding glue works is to use the old analogy of adhesive tape on a box. When you want to ship a package, you seal it with tape. The recipient can open the package by peeling off the tape, which will retain some stickiness, perhaps enough to ship a new package, but far less than when it was fresh off the roll. If you keep applying and removing tape from a box, it will soon not stick at all. Each time you have casual sex, you’re applying tape to a box and then removing it.
Uh, dude, I think you might be doing sex wrong. Are you sure you’re watching porn and not YouTube unboxing videos?
In any case, the bonding glue on the sex packing tape is a very particular sort of glue, in that it’s apparently much longer-lasting when a man handles it, at least in Roosh’s view.
Women lose far more bonding glue than men with each sexual encounter. I believe that most women will only retain enough adhesive to sleep with between one to five men in their lives before irreparably damaging their ability to love any man. This is why contraceptives are disproportionately targeted to them—if you can get women to have casual sex with only a handful of men, your depopulation agenda will be a guaranteed success.
Men, meanwhile, can pack and unpack their sex box with hardly any effect on their sex packing tape, “barely los[ing] any bonding glue with a casual sex encounter. “
Indeed, Roosh is convinced that the 15 years he spent roaming the world in search of women to “bang” had virtually no lasting effect on his ability to love because, he explains,
I was self-aware enough to slow down fornication when I felt it was beginning to damage me, with sufficient bonding glue remaining. I’ve also met many men with notch counts higher than mine who can still bond with women in a reasonably healthy way (as much as modernity allows), but a woman with the same notch count is likely to develop a severe mental illness. Any child she makes will be accidental and raised in a broken home. …
[T]he best chance of creating a successful family is when the woman had all of her bonding glue intact.
I should note that at no point in his post does Roosh bother to provide any actual scientific evidence that might even remotely back up his claims, nor does he even explain what, biologically, he means by “bonding glue.” Presumably he’s referring to oxytocin, a hormone involved in bonding and childbirth. But who knows? Maybe he really thinks cis women are full of glue and that some of this glue gets stuck on each new condom-clad penis that enters them.
In any case, Roosh is convinced that the solution to this glue-depletion problem is for men to raw dog it every time they have sex.
The healthiest approach to sex for men is sleeping with women without the option to use contraceptives or other forms of modern medical assistance. If you couldn’t use a condom, she couldn’t use birth control, there was no option of abortion, and there were no antibiotics to treat the gonorrhea she could give you, would you still sleep with her? If the answer is no then you shouldn’t sleep with her, because you will lose bonding glue for a purely hedonistic experience.
Still, he insists, this is much more of an issue for women and their bonding glue than for men and their glue sticks.
It’s more important for a woman to imagine this scenario than a man, because she can only make a few mistakes before forever saying goodbye to the possibility of love and family. I went on an international bang tour for fifteen years and found love in a hopeless place, but can you imagine a girl doing that? The only thing she’ll find is a bottle of wine to chase down her antidepressant pills.
Dude, just because every woman you’ve ever had sex with felt like shit afterwards doesn’t mean that all straight-sex-having woman feel this way, whether they’ve had sex with one man, or five, or a hundred, over the course of their lives.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Hitler sadly acknowledging the end of a 20-day NoFap streak
By David Futrelle
The other day I introduced you to DiceRollah, a Man Going His Own Way who is also a hardcore semen-retainer who thinks that giving up masturbation and sex will thwart the evil womens out there trying to steal his “life force” and prevent him from being the sort of awesome dude who, in our caveman days, would have been out there “doing fantastic works of cave art or slaying woolly mammoths.”
But it turns out it isn’t just weirdo MGTOWs who prowl the virtual halls of the SemenRetention subreddit, a slightly harder-core alternative to Reddit’s anti-masturbation NoFap subreddit. There are Nazis, too.
And so I would like to introduce you to a fellow called Pmo_addict, a Hitler-loving Redditor who spends most of his time on the site talking about semen and warning his fellow semen-retainers about the allegedly insidious agenda of Teh Jews.
His magnum opus on the subject was a post some four months back declaring that retaining one’s semen was a way of striking back at the Elders of Zion. “The (((elites))) fear men who practice semen retention” he declared, with his post getting more than 80 upvotes from fellow semen-hoarders before one of the mods removed it for its excessively blatant anti-Semitism.
“Everyone who practices semen retention is amazed at all of the awesome benefits of it,” Pmo_addict began, innocently enough.
For most of us it gives us a feeling that we’ve never felt before. But the thing is it used to be how most men felt all the time. It was the default position.All men were strong,energetic, confident, and focused. Even men who had regular sex with their wives had been practicing semen retention for years or decades before and had transmuted so many times that much of the benefits stayed with them.
In case you’re wondering, “transmutation” is basically the NoFap version the Freudian concept of “sublimation,” transforming sexual energy into something else, like artistic creation.
As for the rest of that, [citation fucking needed]. I’m pretty sure dudes in Ye Olden Tymes were jacking it every chance they got. What else was there to do for fun?
All that changed with the advent of porn and the hyper-sexualized society. These days most men start spilling their seed on a daily basis about as soon as they hit puberty.
Pretty sure that was happening even before the internet offered instant access to unlimited porn. Guys used to pop boners watching Annette Funicello on the Mickey Mouse Club. I know a guy who used to jerk it to the women’s underwear section of the Sears Catalog.
They never get to properly develop and become men. Not only is porn use at an alarmingly high level but sex is everywhere you look. Young women today walk around half naked. People are starting to have sex at much younger ages than they did in the past. Every time you watch tv or go to the movies you’re being bombarded with sexual imagery. Men are in a constant state of sexual arousal.
Speak for yourself, dude. Even the horniest of horny teenagers don’t think about sex every minute of every day.
But never mind, because Pmo_addict is about to move on to the Jewish Question.
Israel is one of the few countries in the world where online pornography is banned unless you contact your internet provider, which makes it seemingly impossible for young men to have access to porn and thus much more of them will be practicing SR.
Actually, the bill that would do this hasn’t made it into law yet, and Netanyahu opposes it, but never mind.
But when the Israeli Defense Forces invaded the Palestinian city of Ramallah they took over the tv stations and broadcasted pornography through them. They did this to weaken the Palestinian men.
Apparently the IDF did actually do this, back in 2002, as a form of psychological warfare, though presumably it was intended to shock and disorient Palestinians regardless of gender, not to cause young men to ruin their NoFap streaks.
It’s no coincidence that the same group of (((people))) who control the media,banks, and governments of western countries also control the pornography industry.
[citation needed]
They’re the ones who created the hyper-sexualized society of today. In order for them to keep ruling over us they need men to be in a weakened state. That’s what porn, masturbation, and hyper-sexuality does to you.
How do you even respond to something this ludicrous? I mean, it’s shitty that guys like Pmo_addict are using this particular conspiracy theory to stoke anti-Semitic hate. But at the same time it seems a tad, well, self-defeating. If Nazis want to deprive themselves of one of life’s simple pleasures because they think Teh Jews want to sap their precious bodily fluids, well, I mean, go right ahead, dudes. Your loss.
But Pmo_addict doesn’t just hate the evil porn overlords. He also hates Hollywood. In another comment on the SemenRetention subreddit a couple of months back, he railed against a famously crude comedy because it contained a scene in which Ben Stiller masturbated before a date to calm himself down — setting up a famous sight gag involving Cameron Diaz’s hair.
“Is that … hair gel?”
But Pmo_addict didn’t find that funny at all.
“I remember when ‘There’s Something about Mary’ first came out;” he groused.
Everyone knew about the masturbation scene, even if you hadn’t seen the movie. It was the inside joke of the year. It indoctrinated entire generations of men into thinking fapping is good for you.
The Farrelly Brothers, who wrote and directed the film, and who came up with the rather convoluted masturbation/hair gel joke that still makes Pmo_addict so pig-biting mad, are of course of Irish, not Jewish, descent. But never mind, it’s all the fault of the Jews.
It must be tiring to be this anti-Semitic all the time.
Wait a minute. Is anti-Semitism itself a Jewish plot to sap the life force of young men?
Whoa, I think I just blew my own mind.
We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Carrera and her porn director boyfriend ” Daemon Cins” have each been charged with eight counts of child sexual abuse
By David Futrelle
Porn actress Mercedes Carrera was enthusiastically embraced by the Gamergate crowd after she spoke out in favor of the journalism ethics movement misogynistic harassment campaign in its heyday back in 2014.
But it wasn’t only Gamergates who embraced her and her reactionary, antifeminist politics. As Jared Holt notes in an article on Right Wing Watch, Carrera
was the subject of glowing articles from right-wing media at the time, landing flattering features at The Daily Caller and Breitbart, and appearing on programs hosted by right-wing media figures who supported Gamergate, including Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes and Infowars personality Paul Joseph Watson.
The Daily Caller piece was especially effusive in its praise. “Carrera talks fast and thinks fast,” gushed writer Patrick Bissett.
She sees patterns and connections far quicker than the average person, an ability she attributes to her Asperger’s syndrome.
The article concludes by declaring that “wherever the name Gamergate is mentioned, the name Mercedes Carrera won’t be too far behind.”
The charges against Carrera are serious indeed: she and her boyfriend are accused of repeatedly abusing her 9-year-old daughter over a four-month period. Police say they found evidence corroborating the girl’s accusations during their search of the house, alongside meth and two loaded handguns. Police also say there may be more victims.
Carrera, in a statement, has proclaimed her innocence, saying that the accusations are a ploy by the girls’s father, and Carrera’s ex-partner, to gain custody of the girl. “The charges are absolutely false and horrifying,” she wrote, “and a last ditch effort to keep me from contact with my daughter for the rest of my life.”
While many of her longtime fans (or perhaps now former fans) are holding out hope that she’s telling the truth, their support for her has been largely limited to bland restatements of the phrase “innocent until proven guilty.”
They are a little less inhibited when it comes to denying that she was ever really a big-name Gamergater at all. Which is utter nonsense
Meanwhile, alt-lite conspiracymonger and former Gamergate celebrity Mike Cernovich — a Pizzagate promoter with a long history of baselessly smearing his opponents as pedophiles –has got to be even more embarrassed by his friendship with alleged child sexual abuser Carrera, whom he described in a 2015 blog post as “highly intelligent,” “strong and smart ,” and “thoughtful, intelligent, and fiercely independent.” (Cernovich could probably benefit from an editor, who might have removed a few of these redundancies.)
Now that this “thoughtful” woman has been arrested for allegedly doing the exact same horrific thing that Cernovich regularly accuses his opponents of doing, he has said not a word on the subject — and seems to have deleted any past Tweets he sent her way, though you can still see her side of the extensive discussions they appear to have had.
In his Daily Caller profile of the now-accused porn star, Bissett declared that “[p]ersonal responsibility is a defining motif for Carrera, and one she returns to repeatedly during our conversations.” Apparently Cernovich and Carrera’s many other former Gamergater fans don’t take personal responsibility any more seriously than Carrera herself seems to.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
The Unicode Consortium — the mysterious cabal in charge of the world’s emojis — is adding several hundred new emojis this year, including a bunch catering to the disabled (e.g., a guide dog, an ear with a hearing aid in it, a variety of wheelchairs) and others celebrating everything from falafel to sloths.
But one particular emoji in the new set is causing a bit of a stir: the “pinched hand,” officially designated as a symbol for a “small amount” — but which many have taken to mean “a small amount of penis.” Indeed, a post on Vice welcomed the pinched hand as
an emoji that’s perfect for easily humiliating men when they’re being disgusting online or, you know, being men.
Not everyone is so thrilled. On Reddit, angry dudes in an assortment of man-centric subreddits are protesting what they see as a deliberate attempt by the alleged SJWs of the Unicode Consortium to mock some of the world’s most sensitive men. (They’re also not too keen on the Vice article.)
The most common response from the mangry mob? To call for a new “big vagina” emoji they can send to women. “When’s the ‘cavernous vagina’ emoji coming out?” demanded one Redditor in the Jordan Peterson subreddit.
In the Braincels subreddit — Reddit’s main incel forum — one man put some of the blame for the emoji on supposedly “sissified” men. “270 ’emo’ icons,” he wrote,
yet not a single one to signify an overused vagina to serve as an analogous complement to the small penis
wonder why the double standard?
could it be that american “men” are sissified wimps who have accepted their place underneath the bottom of the totem pole?
Other vagina-obsessed Reddit dudes wondered why there was no emoji they could use to embarrass slutty women by mocking the flappy, roast-beef-like labia they are convinced every woman develops if she sleeps with more than a handful of men over her lifetime.
“[W]e need a roast beef flap emoji,” insisted one incel Redditor, winning himself more than two dozen upvotes for his important contribution to the debate. (Never mind that bitter incels were sending pictures of roast beef sandwiches to women online long before the “tiny dick” emoji was a thing; I know feminist writers and activists who’ve gotten dozen if not hundreds of the things.)
Mangry Redditors also lamented how unfair the new emoji is to the world’s small-dicked men, who apparently deserve the gold medal in the Oppression Olympics. “Men with small penises have no social voice or leverage,” wrote one apparent member of this oppressed minority in the Men’s Rights subreddit.
This is why ppl/society can say anydamnthing to and about us and it’s never viewed as “wrong”
Some lamented what they saw as a body-shaming double-standard. “I never understood this,” one perplexed Men’s Rights Redditor confessed,
it’s okay to mock a man for the size of his penis, despite the fact that he has literally no control over it, but it’s not okay to mock a woman for being a slut when that’s 100% her own decision.
In the Braincels subreddit, the regulars were even angrier about not being allowed to mock women’s physical appearance, despite the fact the dudes on the Braincels subreddit do this every day, all day long. As one incel put it:
Funny how the only things men get body shamed about are things we can’t change (face, height and dick) but women literally just have to not be fat.
Another incel Redditor added a rhetorical suicide threat to his complaint:
I’m gonna fucking hang myself, no woman would ever come close to being made fun of like this for anything they can’t control. It’s so fucking unfair, I just happen to exist with a small dick so I guess I deserve to be made fun of by everyone.
No one would ever praise the existence of a small boob emoji, because a hand symbol for it doesn’t even fucking exist.
If being shamed for having a small dick makes you feel like dying, dude, might I suggest unsubscribing to the Braincel subreddit? No one talks shit about small dicks more than incels. Nowhere else but in incel forums have I seen dudes redefine “small dick” to mean anything less than 8 inches long. Nowhere have I seen more resistance to women telling insecure men that they really don’t care much about dick size and that in fact it can be painful to have large penises inserted in your body.
There were the inevitable laments about Chad and his allegedly huge dick. The “tiny dick emoji” isn’t mocking all men, one Reddit incel insisted.
its mocking unattractive men with small dics. big dick chad and tyrone aint bein mocked here. misandry is code for anti-ugly male.
One Men’s Rights Redditor insisted that the fact that some women are looking forward to having an emoji to send to dudes who fill up their inboxes with unsolicited dick pics means that women in general lack even the most basic understanding of honorable behavior:
Remember, women never learned what honor is. This is straight up hate. They never get taught what honor is. Honorable men don’t go for the weakest spots. They also don’t call people fragile for rightfully being hurt by meanspirited comments about those weakest spots.
Another Men’s Rights Redditor responded to this comment with an even more unbelievably ignorant one:
I can’t actually think of a time in history where women were openly slagged off and insulted by men just for being women.
Uh, how about RIGHT NOW. In the MEN’S RIGHTS SUBREDDIT. In the VERY COMMENT YOU’RE RESPONDING TO.
Also, you might want to consider THE ENTIRE REST OF HUMAN HISTORY.
Naturally more than a few of the angriest men threatened — oh, sorry, warned — that women using the new emoji should expect a furious reaction from the men they send it to. (As if women aren’t already well aware that men often lash out over the tiniest slights.)
A Jordan Peterson fan spelled out his “warning” in ponderous detail:
Once you mock someone, you better have your shit straight, because in my mind that is an invitation for me to make fun of your looks. You think men are insecure about their penis? yeah, not as much as women are about their weight, face, hair, etc.
Gosh, ladies, men might call you fat! I bet you never saw that coming!
This will just be devastating to anyone that uses it due to opening themselves to backlash from men who are amicable until provoked.
“Amicable until provoked” … by a tiny picture of pinching fingers.
I hold back insults because I truly do not wish to harm someone psychologically, and I’m not sure why these women would seek to do it, but if they do it to someone who hasn’t done anything to deserve it they are open to getting owned.
I can guarantuee this emoji will cause more murders than the real gun emoji (the one that they had to replace with the water gun) ever could
But the most, er, imaginative response of all to the new emoji came from the Braincels subreddit from several Redditors who have convinced themselves that the new emoji might so enrage men that they collectively decide to put an end to feminism altogether.
I predict this will be a tipping point for men. It will wake up an entire generation of young men to the blackpill, and it will enrage men to the point where they can’t take it anymore.
I predict a surge of interest in men’s rights/anti-feminism. I predict a surge of men coming out as incels. I predict a surge of ‘misogynist’ insults on social media websites such as Twitter. Call my dick small? I’ll call you a slut. I’ll say your breasts are small. These insults will become more socially acceptable, as a blowback to female misandry.
Gynocentrism can only last for so long. Men are angry, and they’re about to get really angry.
An incel called JucheforWhitePeople seconded that emotion:
This emoji just might be the kind of acceleratioism that we need.
Yes, let’s encourage these thots to be as hypergamous and bitchy as possible. Encourage them to openly say that all short and small-dicked men should die. Let them be as racist as they can to ethnics.
An entire generation of men is going to be blackpilled by the excesses of their toxic femininity. Their copes and hollow platitudes will only fall on deaf ears after that.
Men will stand up and inevitably put an end to feminism. There will be no going back when even the cucks can longer defend what foids are doing.
I hate to break it to you, dude, but angry men have been raging against feminism from the moment it was born, and feminism has survived. The “pinching finger” emoji isn’t going to bring millions of angry dudes to the barricades to overthrow feminism and bring about The Republic of Gilead on earth.
I have mixed feelings about the “tiny dick” emoji myself. On the one hand, it does stigmatize those with small penises, who really don’t deserve this petty form of body shaming.
On the other hand, IT’S JUST A FUCKING EMOJI and I’m guessing that the overwhelming majority of those who get it sent to them will be 1) dudes with roughly average-sized penises who’ve sent pictures of these penises to women who never asked for them or 2) the sort of dudes who go around calling women “foids” to their face.
Also, the emoji can be used for other things. like indicating to someone that that you’re CRUSHING THEIR HEAD.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Carrera, in the middle of what she described as a “rant about feminists whining … about mean tweets while they ignore cultural child rape”
By David Futrelle
Mercedes Carrera — the porn actress recently charged with multiple counts of child sexual abuse — has devoted much of her energy over the past several years to cultivating some of the worst people in the world, from the Gamergate mob to the fascist street gang known as the Proud Boys. And she’s won herself a lot of fans in the process — many of whom are now pretending they never knew her.
During her heyday as an anti-SJW activist, she even managed to win over some men who are not generally known as big fans of women: Reddit’s gang of Men Going Their Own Way. Or at least a good portion of them.
MGTOWs, as readers of this blog are well aware, pretty much hate all women — including those who purport to be their friends and allies. But for some reason (or reasons) they made an exception for Ms. Carrera.
Back in 2017, one MGTOW Redditor posted a video from Carrera that she (accurately) described as a “rant about feminists whining to the UN about mean tweets while they ignore cultural child rape.” In light of the charges against her today, this particular topic seems a tad ironic. But at the time her rant, full of attacks on feminists and praise for men, made a few MGTOW hears beat a little faster.
1- They plummet the value of pussy like noone else can.
2- Boners for days.
But, holy shit this woman just took it to a whole new level.
While many of MGTOW Redditors were skeptical, what with her being a woman and all, a few were even more effusive than the OP in their praise, including one fellow who poured out a virtual manifesto extolling her and what he sees as her “male mentality.”
Mercedes Carrera may be a special case, she has said before she has a male mentality due to being in the autism spectrum, I am friendly with Mercedes Carrera, and have spoken to her on many occasions, she is one of the few women I give credit to … she is impressive. …
I also spoken to porn stars that are just as pathetic and weak, if not even more pathetic and weak, then your average women/girl/female.
Huh. For a man allegedly going his own way he seems to spend a lot of time chatting with porn stars. Perhaps this MGTOW would be better described as a MGHOWEFPS – a Man Going His Own Way Except For Porn Stars.
Mercedes Carrera does get my vote, we agree on almost everything, 99% of the time, she has even spoken my words in her videos before, and we often share the same conclusion. She … support[s] the idea that women should not get special treatment in law or even sociality at large….
I have a feeling she has a distaste for much of her gender’s traits, she is smart and mentally tougher then many girls, and is quick to point out how pathetic women tend to be. She can handle herself in debate and is willing to take criticism or controversial ideas in a manure manner typically.
A “manure manner?” I think he meant “mature,” though his typo is actually more accurate.
I also spoke to another porn star that is on Mercedes Carrera friends list, but is a typical loser women who is basically ran by how insecure and inferior she feels to be a bitter women who is only worth sex and is bitter about her life due to being worthless except for sex and insecure about how no one will ever care about her for anything else. …
TL:DR: Mercedes Carrera is great, and is a example of how good a women can be, … .
Now that she’s been arrested for multiple counts of alleged child sexual abuse, you can’t find a single MGTOW Redditor singing her praises. No, they’d rather use her less-than-flattering mug shot as an excuse to rant about the alleged evils of makeup.
“Jesus Christ she looks like a fucking train wreck in that mug shot,” wrote one MGTOW Redditor several days ago in a thread on her arrest.
That’s her no make up face. Her real face. Make up needs to be out lawed. Women are walking lies wesrjgn that shit
Yeah, that sounds more like the MGTOWs we know and don’t love.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
On Saturday. The Guardian posted a story called “Me and My Vulva,” looking at photographer Laura Dodsworth’s attempt to, as writer Liv Little put it, tell “the stories of 100 women and gender non-conforming people through portraits of their vulvas.” The Guardian featured some of these portraits alongside interviews in which the vulva-havers in question discussed their complicated feelings about their own vulvas and vaginas.
Well, it turns out that some cis men have complicated feelings about vulvas as well, feelings so complicated that they can’t quite believe that the word “vulva” is a specific word, with a specific meaning, that’s worth including in sentences from time to time.
Enter one overconfident fellow called Paul Bullen, who offered what he saw as a correction to the Guardian’s headline:
Since the correct word was in fact “vulva” — Dodsworth’s photos are pictures of the external genitalia — the a number of Twitterers stepped up to correct his correction.
One of the correctors was San Francisco OB/GYN Jen Gunter, an actual world-famous expert on, you know, that whole area down there, and the media’s go-to Gwyneth Paltrow-debunker when the actress and would-be wellness maven tries to convince those with vaginas to do things like steam or stick rocks in them, both of which are evidently very bad ideas. Dr. Gunter has literally written the book on vaginas, or at least a book, titled The Vagina Bible, which will be out in August.
But Bullen, like many men in similar situations, refused to accept his defeat, and simply kept going, suggesting that those who refused to accept his “correction” were simply a bunch of vulva snobs.
Er,”euphemism treadmill psychology?”
Er, I’m pretty sure that the Vagina Monologues involved considerable discussion of things going into vaginas so I’m going to say no to that.
When it came to Dr. Gunter’s quite specific expertise on this issue, Bullen evidently felt it was outweighed by his confidence as a man with opinions on the internet.
He’s using an awful lot of words to basically say: “Ok, the ‘correct’ definition I used isn’t actually correct, according to the dictionary, but since people use the word incorrectly a lot this incorrect usage is actually the correct one and all you correcty-pants people are actually incorrect with all your fancy correctness, I am very smart.”
Ultimately, THE DICTIONARY ITSELF (or at least Dictionary,com) felt compelled to intervene, noting that the word “vulva” is indeed the correct word for the external genitalia — which is, again, what Dodsworth’s photos depict.
Bullen wasn’t fazed by all the talk of dictionary definitions because, in his mind, he’s smarter than the dictionary too.
When some critics accused him of mansplaining, he tried to mainsplain mansplaining to them:
Dr. Gunter gently corrected him on that:
She also reiterated the rather basic point — which Bullen seemed unable to grasp — that the photos in question were photos of vulvas, not vaginas.
Last night I felt compelled to weigh in myself:
None of this — not even my especially brilliant tweet — stopped Bullen from endlessly repeating his point, and the, er, “debate” went on and on and on until, only a few hours ago, Bullen finally decided to stop posting on the subject.
In case you’re wondering if Paul Bullen has bad opinions on any other subjects aside from the correct use of the terms “vagina” and “vulva,” the answer is yes.
Bullen has also recently retweeted white nationalist congressman Steve King, white nationalist “journalist” Faith Goldy, and the white nationalist website VDare. You may notice a trend here. Not that Bullen would necessarily agree that any of these white nationalists are in fact white nationalists. Indeed, he has already used his powerful MAN LOGIC to convince himself that King has never said anything even vaguely white supremacist-ish.
But there’s more! Turns out Bullen is one of those people who contends that the Covington Catholic students photographed several years ago wearing blackface were not wearing blackface.
But, hey, at least his love life is going well:
I don’t know if Bullen has yet managed to make contact with either this woman’s vulva or her vagina.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Even Brad Pitt gets sand kicked on him at the beach
By David Futrelle
Manosphere misogynists seem to think that the world is basically the first three panels of that famous cartoon Charles Atlas ad writ large, in which musclebound “Bullies of the Beach” are continually kicking sand on wimpy beta males and humiliating them in front of their girlfriends.
Indeed, many manosphere dudes are convinced that that this old cartoon ad is a completely accurate description of how the world works. Forget all the women out there with skinny husbands or boyfriends; forget all the women writing fanfic about Benedict Cumberbatch. These guys honestly believe that literally the only men that women want to have sex with are big, burly jocks.
Consider this recent comment in the Men Going Their Own Way subreddit that conveniently captures all the key elements of this manosphere delusion. Warning against the dangers of female “hypergamy,” by which he evidently means the innate tendency of every straight women to immediately drop whatever man she’s with if a Chadly jock looks her way, the MGTOW Redditor who calls himself GamingYourMom declares that
while rock stars and famous actors can be considered acttractive, they will get cucked by a professional athlete everytime. It’s just like high school. Nothing has changed. The jocks roll in pussy.
MGTOWs seem utterly convinced that the world works exactly like high school — or at least how they imagine high school works. In some sense, they’ve never graduated; they’re still jealous of the high school football star who dated the cheerleader they had a crush on. Literally.
If you are at the top of the pyramid in theatre or band, you can nail a hot nerdy chick, but you still don’t get the cheerleaders.
You know, I’m pretty sure the theater guy dating the “hot nerdy chick” preferred her to the cheerleaders, because, you know, people generally like dating people they have something in common with?
But never mind, because apparently the jocks are out there cucking even the world’s most famous theater guys:
Brad better keep Angelina away from NFL players if he knows what’s good for him.
Yes, he brought up Brad Pitt, every manosphere misogynist’s favorite — if perhaps a teensy bit outdated — example of the ultimate handsome dude. Never mind that Brad and Angelina split MORE THAN TWO YEARS AGO and have been fighting bitterly over the terms of their divorce ever since. Never mind that even after this split Angelina has never been spotted hitting the town with a football team.
And you can be ugly as fuck and still consistently pull if you are over six feet.
More bad news for Brad, who’s only 5′ 11″ tall!
And no one in this sub is Brad Pitt, so if you’re not 6ft., you’re fucked. Women say as much in their tinder bio. “If you’re not at least 6ft., go ahead and swipe left.”
I’ve never used Tinder, but I’ve used other dating sites and apps, and while I’ve seen women (some women) express a preference for tall guys, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a woman categorically ruling out all men under 6 feet.
Nature says big guys win the fight, and a woman wants to fuck a winner.
Uh, I’m pretty sure most women prefer being with men who aren’t always getting into fights, for assorted very obvious reasons.
And this isn’t even how nature — red in tooth and claw — works. If size were the only — or even the most influential — determining factor in evolutionary success, wouldn’t humans have evolved to be huge monsters? Wouldn’t every animal? Why would short men — or small animals — even exist?
Elephants are the largest land animals, and can kill people with a swing of their trunk. There are about 450,000 of them left in the world. Rabbits are small and fuzzy and scare almost nobody; though there are no reliable estimates of the rabbit population, there are probably billions of them. (At one point there were ten billion in Australia alone.) I live in a fairly dense neighborhood in a major metropolitan area, and I regularly spot wild rabbits hopping across lawns and in the alleyways. I’ve never seen an elephant wander by.
Here are some bunny videos, just for the hell of it.
But I digress. The point is that MGTOWs don’t know anything about anything and seem to think the world works like Charles Atlas ads.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
A specter is haunting the IncelsWithoutHate subreddit, a specter who calls himself leftexincel, and he’s bringing with him the glorious science of Marxism.
Leftexincel, a former incel who now boasts that he’s had “a couple of girlfriends” whom he’s “had sex with on multiple occasions” showed up on Reddit’s main hangout for supposedly non-hateful incels last week to warn them of the dangers of losing their true selves in what he sees as a pointless quest “to obtain what is today arguably the most important form of social capital, a female companion … .”
The weird thing is that he kind of, sort of, has a point, or at least half of one. But in the end the small bits of truth in his critique become buried underneath a pile of bullshit. The problems isn’t really his turgid Marxist language — though this doesn’t help — but rather his lingering hatred of both himself and the women he’s apparently convinced to date him.
Leftexincel introduces himself as a “by no means very attractive” twentysomething who,
with an inhuman amount of effort, [has] ‘ascended’ to being a normie, with my own day job’s income and place, a halfway finished BA at a university, a couple of girlfriends (none higher than a ‘4’) and a current girlfriend I’ve had sex with on multiple occasions (also probably no higher than a ‘4’ or maybe ‘4.5’ if I asked the layman), all met at work and school.
Despite his newly-won status as a “normie,” and what he correctly calls “the ‘reactionary’ character of the online incel community,” leftexincel informs the IncelsWithoutHate crowd that
I highly sympathize with it and believe that it is the product of legitimate structural failures of modernity against men and that the cause lies in the increased social demand to be more than just an authentic individual and partner to a woman, but a full ‘product’ that needs to be valorizable as more than a partner but as a commodity and status object in general.
Here leftexincel is basically reiterating the old critique, articulated perhaps most clearly by sociologist David Riesman in the 1950s, that modern capitalism has transformed people from “inner-directed” characters, living according to moral codes, to “other directed” personalities more concerned with impressing others and fitting in. Back in the 50s, cultural critics complained about other-directed up-and-comers trying to curry favor by glad-handing at the office and holding well-attended dinner parties; today, the critics lament all those wannabe influencers building their brands on Instagram.
But leftexincel quickly loses the plot, insisting that, in our excessively materialistic world, money not only can buy you love but that you really can’t find love without it.
With the decline of old rigid patriarchal structures this subjectivity in relations has opened up but in a world where, increasingly, value must come from socioeconomic status, which can primarily be sold materially in the form of: disposable income or other forms of capital, a conformed physical appearance and outwardly matching confidence and (sexually enticing) personality; all elements that improve one’s ability to sell oneself and acquire the means to purchase others.
Never mind that most poor people the world over end up finding love — and that some rich people never do.
Attraction is a financial transaction exchanged for either financial or social capital, and one must have both or be able to acquire either one with the other to succeed in obtaining intimacy.
Bullshit.
I strongly believe that ‘neurodivergent’ incels in reality fail to find intimacy because they would never want to sacrifice their authenticity for conformity, and that this is then communicated through a resentment of the object of desire (an authentic female companionship).
Close, but very much not it. He’s right about the resentment part, but he doesn’t realize how poisonous the incels; “authentic” selves are to begin with. To put it in Reisman’s terms: While excessive other-direction is both phony and manipulative and in the end rather shallow, incels tend to embrace a reductive form of inner direction, castigating women for not seeing their supposed sterling inner qualities and focusing instead on their supposedly sub-par physical features. What incels don’t realize, of course, is that the toxic attitudes they exude are the real turn-off, not their allegedly inferior bone structure.
Now leftexincel wants these resentful dudes to know that they won’t be happy even if they do finally manage, like him, to “ascend.”
I’m not much happier now that I’ve improved myself, but in effect that is the real problem: anyone can ‘ascend’ if they truly try hard enough, but it will never really fulfill any real needs … .
Well it won’t if you have that attitude, mister!
So why doesn’t leftexincel believe in life after love? (Sorry, Cher.) Is it because the relationships he’s stumbled into so far haven’t lived up his exaggerated hopes? Or that they were objectively shitty relationships? Is he resentful that the women he’s dated haven’t been as “hot” as he would like? That’s got to be at least part of it, given that he managed to bring up their allegedly worse-than-average looks of his various girlfriends twice in a single sentence.
Leftexincel follows this dispiriting take on love with the least-inspiring utopian vision I’ve seen in a long time:
My ideal would not so much be a world in which society itself coerces women to (once more) conform to being the guaranteed other to men (enforced monogamy, arranged marriage, social division in sex, etc.) … but rather a world in which propertied social capital is an impossibility and … sex and romance is then reduced purely to its own, non-vital element of life.
Well that’s rather depressing. There are people who live happy lives without sex or romance — because they honestly don’t desire those things. It’s considerably less healthy to abandon such things because you’ve basically given up in despair.
Essentially this means that for all intents and purposes incels are right about the present state of things, and do identify a problem, and are right when saying that, objectively, when one is an incel, there is little more to do than try to ‘looksmaxx’ or whatever oneself to be as close to a ‘normie’ as possible. And likewise I share the agreement that this is a decrepit state for a society to be in.
I’ll give him points for at least recognizing that returning to patriarchy would be both impossible and a bad thing for women. But I don’t think he’s going to win over many incels — or anyone else, for that matter — by proclaiming that the world sucks and love is an illusion and there’s pretty much noting we can do about it.
His message certainly didn’t win him many fans in the IncelsWithoutHate subreddit. One regular proclaimed that he’d
rather work my ass off and save some money so that I can finally go to Eastern Europe or Thailand on a sex vacation, and cope by indulging in all of my perverted fantasies, than live at the mercy of a benevolent communist state that would pretend to take care of all my material needs, in exchange for conformity of thought and abandoning my personal freedom … .
Another complained that under communism
the same Chad who used to bully us will be able to use his charisma to get elevated into Comrade Chad, worker’s council representative and valuable member of the party .. .
Meet the new Chad. Same as the old Chad.
For what it’s worth, leftexincel insists that the “the violent power fantasies” of Stalinists and other totalitarian communists
are just re-imaginings of their own particular resentment through a modern lens.
As far as he’s concerned,
any hypothetical future communism is guaranteed to have nothing to do with historical Stalinism in the slightest … .
But let’s set all that aside for the moment. Because in the end what undermines leftexincel’s critique isn’t so much its Marxism, which is somewhat attenuated to begin with. It’s that, to paraphrase his own rhetoric, leftexincel’s new science of Marxism-Incelism is basically little more than a re-imagining of the same old incel resentment through a quasi-Marxist lens. And that’s not very revolutionary at all.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Painted stones at a memorial for the Parkland victims honoring the murdered students and school staffers that some incels are mocking today
By David Futrelle
Valentine’s Day is a shitty day for a lot of people who aren’t in happy relationships, and it’s an especially shitty day for incels who have put their bitterness over their own romantic and sexual failures at the core of their identity.
But some of the regulars on the Incels.is forums have found a perverse reason to celebrate the day this year — because today is not only Valentine’s Day; it’s also the first anniversary of the murder of 17 students and staffers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Incels celebrated the attack when it happened, and some of them are celebrating it just as enthusiastically today.
“Valentines day feels a little more special this year,” Incels.is commenter Angryatsociety declares in a post labeled “LifeFuel” today, announcing that he’s going to “block out my own meaninglessness and sadness” about the holiday and his life “with something that made me feel happy.” That is, the Parkland murders.
“I’m happy for Valentine’s day because this time around I finally have something to celebrate,” he explains.
[W]hen other high schools were painted red with flower decorations those hallways at the [Marjory Stoneman Douglas] freshman building were painted red with tiny puddles of blood and .223 shell casings. I FUCKING LOVE CARNAGE!!!!!!!!!
He recalls his reaction to the news a year ago:
That morning when I was sad about being alone was overturned with a sense of joy when I heard someone say theres been a shooting then checked the news on my phone and went to the snapchat map and saw that masterpiece vid of those kids screaming inside the classroom with gunshots ringing out (i hadn’t had that much of a field day since las vegas).
He especially enjoyed the cell-phone videos of Parkland students reacting in terror to the sound of gunfire in their school.
That moment when the burst of gunshots happened with some kid saying “omg holy shit omg” I chuckled right after the girl screamed her whoreish ass off.
He declares himself grateful that he lives in a world in which mass shootings have become almost routine.
I hate people and society so much and you know what? Everyone of these mass killings wheather done with a car, a knife, a bomb, starting a fire, poisoning, or an ar 15 super duber scary rifle……………….makes me glad I’m alive to watch the world that’s why I check the news every 30 min. Everytime I check the news, i get this hopeful feeling that somewhere in the world a mass causality attack happened
Luckily for him they do happen with alarming frequency.
i look at china first with their vehicle and knife attacks, because they draw the inspiration that no matter how many road barriers you put up, no matter how many guns you ban, no matter how many people are put under authoritarian surveillance…………………. there will still be a backback bomb detonating outside an elementary school.
Fucking monster.
Time to address the real problem society.
Nikolas cruz wasn’t the first and he is the furthest from being the last.
My only regret about that day is that he didint meet his goal of killing 20 people.
I’m in the mood for writing a long ass fan letter to him rn.
Oh, but he’s not encouraging mass murder; he’s just happy when it happens
I’m not inciting any crime or threat of violence, I’m just saying why I have something to really like about Valentine’s day now.
Live on hero, everyday I hope to see more just like you……………….. and i see the world ending another day hahahahahhahahahahahahahah.
In a followup comment, he said he thought
the bloodshed across the world will forever continue, I hope it gets so bad to the point where a sizeable amount of people are too scared to go out into puplic and theres armed guards with automatic rifles at every store, venue, event, etc.
I love the kind fear the public has.
While there were a few dissenters, most of those who responded to Angryatsociety’s post on Icels.is shared his sentiments.
“Fills me up with joy,” wrote AsiaCel, a prolific contributor to Incels.is who has posted more than 3000 comments to the site.
I don’t support mass shooting, but my support/against won’t change anything it’s going to happen regardless. Might as well sit back and watch the show.
Others suggested that the bloodshed was necessary to bring attention to their inability to find dates. According to commenter Hate_My_Life,
All this pain and suffering is something that society and people deserve until they open their fucking eyes and ask: Is there a problem with us?
It will probably take millions of deaths before they even question that, but I’ll be waiting (Again, I’m not encouraging violence/shooting up schools).
I hate women indeed, but the world follows closely behind.
Someone called FinnCel agreed:
No one talks about loneliness until a couple of students get shot.
Even then, it’s briefly mentioned and the discussion changes to gun control, instead of loneliness prevention.
I don’t support shootings but it is a necessary evil. Those brief moments when our loneliness is mentioned, when put together enough times, just might open the society’s eyes and we will finally be noticed
That’s the logic of terrorism.
Once again, I’m struck by how similar this particular incel argument is to Jordan Peterson’s infamous argument for “enforced monogamy.” Like the incels, Peterson suggested that this kind of male violence is the inevitable result of women rejecting certain kinds of men; indeed, he made his comments in response to a question about the Toronto van killer, a self-described incel. “He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Peterson declared in an interview with the New York Times. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy.”
It’s an argument that’s absurd on so many levels it’s hard to even know where to begin. Somehow cajoling (or outright forcing) women into dating the sort of guy who contemplates mass murder when he can’t get a date won’t solve the problem of male violence; it will simply shift the target of the anger. Men who are this angry about being told no outside of a relationship will almost certainly get angry about being told no in a relationship — and will have the perfect opportunity to take out this anger on their partners and children.
These men might not go and shoot up a school, but some of them would almost certainly end up murdering their partners and other family members. Indeed, these sorts of murder-suicides happen so regularly they almost never get national attention, and “enforced monogamy” would almost certainly make them much more common.
This sort of male violence is born from the same sort of aggrieved entitlement that drives the incels. You can’t solve it by forcing (or even by more subtly cajoling) women into giving these entitled men what they say they want, because they will simply find new reasons to feel aggrieved. That’s especially true of incels, whose entire identity is built around their sense of grievance. (Take a look at yesterday’s post to see an ex-incel talking about how aggrieved he remains even after finding several girlfriends.) The real problem isn’t that these men feel aggrieved; it’s that they feel entitled.
Depressing thoughts for Valentine’s Day, but then again this blog specializes in the worst people in the world. I’ll put up a Valentine’s Day open thread for those who’d rather discuss somewhat more pleasant things,
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Will the evil Judeo-Masonic (((Illuminati))) cabal that apparently determines what sort of pants that people wear stop at nothing?
Evidently not, if this meme from a now-defunct racist conspiracy site is anything to go by:
I had no idea that one’s choice of pants determines who you have sex with and whether or not you have a career.
But the site that originally posted this meme, Smoloko.com, described itself as “a independent run news-organization which strives to deliver educational and informative information and news” on such topics as “false-flag terrorism, the (((Illuminati))) central banking cartel [and] world-wide Judeo-Masonic misconduct,” so clearly they must know more about such things than a humble blogger such as myself.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Not long ago, one MGTOW Redditor warned his collegues of a heretofore unknown danger to men: fat women pretending to be pregnant in order to force innocent men to give up their seats for them on public transportation.
So i was on the commuter train earlier and it was super busy meaning a lot of people had to stand. There was this fat woman that had a pin saying baby onboard to indicate that she’s pregnant. She then asked the couple that was sat next to me if she could have one of their seats, and she got one of their seats.
As Patsy from AbFab might say (if she were an angry dude posting on Reddit):
Jay continued his tale of terror:
Now I’m not going to say she was lying about being pregnant, I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt but because she was fat i thought to myself, this could be the easiest hustle ever for fat women that don’t get a seat on public transport. No one will ever question them and they will just give them their seat. I wonder how many fat, non pregnant women do that.
Clearly Jay has his female-fraud-detector turned up to 11, as we all should in these perilous times for men. He’s so sensitive to signals of possible female fraud that he’s able to witness an apparently pregnant women WHO MIGHT JUST BE FAT and NOT PREGNANT AT ALL getting a seat on a train, and to deduce from this that FAT LADIES PRETENDING TO BE PREGNANT to get seats on trains MIGHT JUST BE some sort of WORLDWIDE EPIDEMIC OF FEMALE SEAT-STEALING FRAUD!
Besides. even is she WAS pregnant, she was still FAT.
Even if she is legitimately pregnant, you can tell that she was fat before she got pregnant and she looks no different to any random fat chick that’s not pregnant, in fact there have been some fat women that have gone into labour without even knowing they were pregnant at all .
Yes, let’s all get mad about the hypothetical possibility that some fat woman who doesn’t know she’s pregnant will pretend to be pregnant (even though she actually is pregnant and just doesn’t know it) in order to steal his seat on the train?
So yeah i just wanted to share that, there are probably a few fat women out there exploiting being fat by lying about being pregnant to get seats on public transport.
Damn those being-fat-exploiters out there taking advantage of the non-fat!
Side note, what kind of pissed me off about the whole encounter is the fact that when the pregnant woman got the seat, she said thank you, and the woman in the couple is the one that responded by saying you’re welcome, but she’s not even the one that gave up her seat, it was her boyfriend that gave his seat up. Yet another woman taking credit for a man’s actions
I think we all owe a hearty “thank you” to the REAL HERO here, the dude who watched an apparently pregnant woman ask for a seat on a train and decided she might not really be pregnant and then got so mad about it that he sat down hours later and wrote a long post about it on Reddit.
Thankfully, Jay’s colleagues on the MGTOW subreddit appreciated his insights on this important issue.
“They’re just fat and wanting free seats then there are none,” replied DangZagnut. “Standard female entitlement.”
Another added his own evidence of this ongoing female fraud.
Many a time I have heard women on public transport say “I’ll just say I am pregnant” to their friend. Not sure how it works elsewhere but there’s apparaently a fine for not giving up your seat for a pregnant lady here. There’s like stickers inserted on train (or tram) windows as a notification.
Stay frosty, men! You never know when a fake-pregnant lady is going to steal your seat — or maybe have you arrested and sent to the cuck farms if you don’t give it up quickly enough,
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
The standard answer to this old riddle is some variation of “step on his foot.” These days you can achieve the same result by simply showing the Nazi in question an ad featuring a happy interracial couple — whether it’s an ad for cereal, sweatpants, or, for maximum effect, condoms.
Nazis and their fellow travelers online are currently losing it over a screenshot of a Durex ad featuring a cartoon couple apparently gearing up to celebrate Valentine’s day in bed. The problem? The man is black, and the woman — covered in tattoos and sporting pink and purple hair — is white.
Though Durex has run ads featuring interracial couples before, this particular ad seems so perfectly designed to enrage white supremacists — who hate brightly dyed hair, tattooed women and the idea of “breaking tradition” nearly as much as they hate people of color — that I can’t help but wonder if it’s even real. (I looked for it on Durex’s social media pages and couldn’t find it, and Durex’s press office hasn’t responded to a query I sent them about it yesterday.)
Regardless, the screenshot is being passed around by far-right “white genocide” worriers and they don’t like it one bit. They’re not offended because the “breaking tradition” line fetishizes interracial sex as something that’s especially exciting because it’s taboo, much in the way that cuckold porn featuring black men and white “hotwives” does. No, they just don’t like the idea of a black man — even a cartoon black man — getting his hands on a white woman. .
“They hate you. AND they know race is real,” groused one commenter on the blog Patriactionary, “Never forget.”
On 4chan’s famously racist and anti-Semitic /pol/ board, meanwhile, one angry anon denounced the ad for encouraging white women to break “[t]he tradition of not fucking pavement apes.”
But no one has gotten quite so angry about the cartoon couple as Daily Stormer head boy Andrew Anglin, who denounced the ad as propaganda for a nefarious Jewish plot “to deny white men access to all forms of sex” in a furious diatribe posted on his site over the weekend.
After complaining that it’s hard to even find an ad these days that “doesn’t have a white woman with a n***er,” Anglin laid into the ad itself:
This one is specifically extreme, because they are literally saying “break tradition and fuck a n***er” – as if this woman has a tradition of sex with white men. I don’t know any white women who have such a tradition. They are all a bunch of greasy, stinking n***er-fucking whores, many of them with foot fungus they refuse to treat.
In case you’re wondering about that last bit, it’s a reference to actress Brie Larson, once photographed on the red carpet in open-toed shoes that seemed to reveal feet that looked a bit fungusfied.
It’s funny though that you never see white men with black women. Or white men with anyone, actually. It is always a white woman, and usually she’s with a black man.
Really? Because I see white couples in ads all the time. And I’m pretty sure I’ve seen more ads with white men and black women than the reverse, probably because ad execs think they’re less likely to result in them getting death threats from angry white dudes. (Interracial-porn producers, aiming for the id, are much more likely to pair black men with white women, a fact that also causes Nazis and other racist conspiracy theorists with much consternation. But we’ll get to porn in a second.)
It’s almost as if the creators of these ads are [pushing] a virulent Jewish agenda to deny white men of sex completely.
That’s … a bit of a leap.
Anglin followed up this big leap with another one, arguing that, sometime soon, sex-denied white men — whitecels? — would only be able to mate with Rosy Palm and her five daughters.
They are literally giving away OUR WOMEN – and yes, they do belong to us collectively – and then telling us to just go watch porn.
And porn, in Anglin’s mind, is even worse for white men than condom ads.
This is because porn keeps lonely white men docile. It is the most powerful drug with no obvious consequences. It is a massive dopamine dump. And it makes men okay with the fact that they don’t have girlfriends or wives.
Oh, but Anglin’s alleged Jewish conspiracy goes way beyond condom ads and internet porn.
The point is: you should understand that everything that is happening in the world is designed to target YOU. None of it is really coherent. You see these things that conflict in the liberal narrative – like women’s empowerment and porn, or homosexuality and Islam, or any number of other obvious things – and you ask how they can exist next to each other. And the answer is, because all of it harms white men.
Yes, that’s right. He thinks that Islam is part of a Jewish plot to destroy white men.
You look around at everything and it only makes sense if you say: “all of this is being designed for the explicit purpose of harming white men.” There is no other explanation for anything that is going on.
This is your brain on Nazism.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
It’s hard to think of a more embarrassing memetic self-own than the ubiquity of the “hot white girl complaining about white genocide” memes on the alt-right internet.
You know the ones: the memes featuring gauzy, artfully photoshopped pics of young women — sometimes very young — that are festooned with weirdly turgid captions about the alleged dangers of race-mixing and demands that “the Beauty of the White Aryan Woman Must Not Perish from the Earth.”
This isn’t a new phenomenon. I wrote about former KKK Grand Wizard and current dirty old man David Duke’s penchant for posting pics of young hotties forced to spout racist sentiments. And I’ve written as well about the Daily Stormer’s attempt to turn Taylor Swift into an unwilling white-supremacist mouthpiece — at least until the Nazi memers had their hearts brokenwhen they discovered that she actually hates them.
But whenever I poke around in the world of alt-right memery I fund myself struck by how persistent these memes — despite the fact that they’re basically one huge self-own, revealing the alt-right to be filled to overflowing with lonely, horny dudes obsessed with women (and teenage girls) way too young for them.
Also, I’m struck again and again by just how inept these guys are at making memes, with many of the memes in this particular genre clotted with embarrassingly prolix disquisitions on the alleged perfection of the white race, sometimes in type so small they’re hard to read.
Here are some of the most cringeworthy of the “Aryan Babe” memes I’ve come across recently.
Yeah, pretty sure she’s not thinking any of that.
I like how the word “JEWS” is highlighted, in case you happened to miss the anti-Semitism at first glance.
Dude, maybe next time use a pic without a watermark?
Well, that’s not any better.
Love to feature small children in racist memes about rape!
And speaking of children:
Speaking of “FORCED,” neither of these kids asked to be included in racist memes, dudes!
You may have to read this next one twice. Even though it’s so badly designed that it’s hard to read even once.
Graphic design is my passion!
These Nazi memers seem to be equally passionate about really young, or at least young-looking women.
At this point you may want a shower … for your eyes.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
So-called “Men Going Their Own Way” are so bad at the whole “going their own way” part of their little woman-hating credo that they sometimes have sex with women.
As you might imagine, this often does not go very well for either person involved. Consider this “field report” posted to the MGTOW subreddit recently by one sex-having Redditor, which may just put you off food and/or sex forever.
i don’t know why i do this anymore. i really don’t.
None of us know why you do this. Aren’t you supposed to be going your own damn way?
the whole experience was traumatizing and disgusting. she was 26, around 5’2″ and petite.
That poor woman had no idea what she was in for.
making out on a park bench, i was careful to nibble around her mouth. there was something off-putting about her saliva maybe. a slight metallic aftertaste. this is true for the vast majority of girls though: i don’t like the taste.
I’m sure you taste utterly delicious yourself. Astringent, with a delicate aftertaste of bitterness and an entire life wasted.
getting back to her place, fumbling around in the dark to get her clothes off. disappointment at those 5-10 lb of concealed pudge.
How dare she be slightly less skinny than you expected!
she was totally put together in clothes, but had a falling-apart body with a thicker lower half and droopy sad tits
Dude, you are a droopy sad tit.
and this is a girl who works out and is in top 20% of americans her age.
She probably spent most of her next workout session wailing on a punching bag with fists and feet, imagining that it was your sorry ass.
touching her amorphous “spinner” bod, fingering her slimepit. i was so sadly deflated.
No one who uses the phrase “fingering her slimepit” has ever had good sex with anyone.
i felt an obligation to go down on her to prep her for the actual sex. so i did, and it was as awful as i imagined.
Yeah, I can’t imagine it was much of a treat for her either.
there was some acidic/fruity smell emanating, and i essentially used my lower lip to smush against her relatively clean clit, so as to avoid having my tongue come into contact with the main portion of her gaping moist hole.
I can’t imagine her “hole” was either gaping or moist at this point. It was probably trying to sew itself shut.
my dick was floppy and unenthused the whole time despite my having taken a cialis.
Dude, no amount of Cialis is going to fix what ails you, as your problems appear to stem from a giant deposit of toxic sludge in your brain. And where are you getting Cialis from, anyway? Do you go to Donald Trump’s old doctor?
i immediately went into nervous hyper-focus mode as i tried to get the condom on, stroke my dick into readiness, and finger and prep her while angling my semi-flaccid dick for the final insertion. trying not to be awkward while sweating from the prospect of failure.
Here’s me right now:
Onward:
once it was in, i was able to pump for a good long while, but didn’t want to change positions so as not to jeopardize my erection.
i came into the condom and immediately rushed out to clean up. i noticed a thick layer of white slime had accumulated past the condom and on the upper portion of my shaft.
Dude, you are a thick layer of white slime.
i felt chills and literally shivered with horror as i rinsed off in the shower.
You and me both, dude.
i now have some inkling of why i hate dating so much, and why my standards for women and romance and abstract ideals are so high. it’s because the actual act of sex is so appalling, anything less than perfection in the other areas would fail to compensate
Dude, think for a moment about all the times you’ve had sex. (It shouldn’t take too long.) What do all of these experiences have in common?
That’s right: YOU. It’s not that “the actual act of sex is appalling.” Most people seem to enjoy it. It’s that the actual act of sex WITH YOU is so appalling that you should never, ever do it ever again, both for your sake and for the sake of every woman in the world, so that they don’t have to even imagine what it would be like to have sex with you.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
Browsing the Jordan Peterson subreddit today, I scrolled past the link to an article on a right-wing clickbait site asserting that “Hate Crime Hoaxes are More Common than You Think.”
I paused for a moment at a post denouncing “More State Enforced Cultural Marxism” — by which the OP meant programs to teach children that gay and trans people exist. I sighed a little at the post declaring that “It is time to talk about female privilege.” (Pretty sure it isn’t.)
But I stopped dead at this post:
Was this person reading the same subreddit I was? I scrolled up to the top of the page. Yep, I was remembering correctly: this was still the literal top unstickied post, with more than 200 upvotes, complaining about a joke on Twitter suggesting that perhaps it was a teensy bit silly for white dudes to get quite so bent out of shape about a woman playing Captain Marvel:
Huh, I wondered. Was it possible that perhaps the victimhood-lamenters of the Jordan Peterson subreddit kind of, sort of, like playing the victims themselves?
No, I thought, that couldn’t be true.That would be too hypocritical, even for them, I must be wrong.
I mean, it’s not like the Jordan Peterson subreddit is chock-full of whiny laments by white dudes convinced they’re being denied their rightful share of success by evil SJWs and unqualified people of color.
Oh wait.
It’s not like some of them have convinced themselves that “neo-Marxist” SJWs and uppity “Black Females” are conspiring to destroy their careers, deny them healthcare, and take away their right to vote.
It’s not like they’re furious that men might no longer be celebrated as the noble heroes responsible for every good thing accomplished in the history of Western Civilization — including all a dose paintings by da ottist youse all may know as da Vince!
It’s not like they’re furious at the SJW’s supposed anti-white-male-doctor agenda — whether the doctors in question are real or fictional.
In the comments to that post, one of the more reasonable Jordan Peterson fans concedes that maybe only “97-98 out of a 100” real-world heroes are men.
It must be hard for members of such a truly oppressed class to ward off the temptation to play the victim. I, for one, salute the denizens of the Jordan Peterson subreddit for their heroism in standing up against victimhood culture.
NOTE FOR EXTREMELY LITERAL-MINDED READERS: Post may contain sarcasm.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
If you’re wondering whether Godwin’s Law still has a role to play in a world that’s once again filled with actual Nazis, the answer is yes, because how else are we going to deal with the so-called involuntary celibates on the Incels.is forums who are currently comparing their lack of a sex life to the literal Holocaust, and concluding that what they’re dealing with is somehow worse.
A week ago, one regular Incels.is commenter called lifeisbullshit95 dropped this alleged truth bomb on his incel colleagues:
His message was somehow even more inflammatory than his headline, an all-caps wall-of-text rant, sans line breaks and even punctuation, declaring that all but the handsomest of men are suffering a “NEW HOLOCAUST” because of Facebook and Tinder.
“THIS IS THE NEW HOLOCAUST,” he began.
HITLER TARGETED THE JEWS TINDER AND SOCIAL MEDIA HAVE TARGETED SUB8 MEN WE’RE DYING A PAINFUL SEXLESS LIFE FULL OF SUFFERING AND DEPRESSION
Huh. Quick survey: Raise your hand if you’re a SUB8 MAN and you’ve had sex. Hell, raise your hand if you’re SUB8 and still alive, despite all the Holocausting from Tinder and Facebook.
Oh, but apparently you don’t have to be physically dead to count as a dude killed by social media.
HOW MANY LIFE TINDER,INSTAGRAM,FACEBOOK ECC HAVE CLAIMED YET? LIVING A SEXLESS LIFE ISN’T LIVING
Raise your hand if you’re not having sex at the moment but are somehow still living a life worth living.
ESPECIALLY AS MAN THEY DEFINITELY CLAIM MY LIFE AND THE SADDEST THING IS THAT NOBODY IS DOING ANYTHING WE’RE LEFT GETTING MURDERED
I can’t help but think of poor, rollerskating Terry on Reno 911.
Of course, Reno 911 was a comedy, and lifeisbullshit95, who has posted more than 700 decidedly non-humorous comments to Incels.is forums, isn’t kidding.
Like many incels lifeisbullshit95 is convinced that social media makes women too stuck up to even consider having sex with any but the most Chadly of men. This, as it turns out, is a widespread belief in the Manosphere, promoted by everyone from MRA douchebag Paul Elam to PUA douchebags like Roosh V to the denizens of MGTOWforums,,com. As these misogynistic men see it, women on dating sites and social media get so much flattery from thirsty men that they come to see themselves as better than the “looksmatched” men they should be dating. (Incels don’t really seem to understand how many of the “flattering” messages that women get online are literal dick pics or otherwise creepy as fuck.)
NOBODY FIGHT SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE DATING APPS THAT HAS GIVEN SO MUCH POWER TO WOMEN EVEN TALKING ABOUT THIS TOPIC IS TABOO
And so somehow we’re back in 1930s Germany, but this time women are Hitler.
HITLER CAME TO POWER BECAUSE THE GERMANS WERE AN- GRY AND WANTED A REVOLUTION WOMEN CAME TO POWER BECAUSE THEY FELT ANGRY ABOUT NOT HAVING EQUAL RIGHTS AND WANTED A REVOLUTION IT’S ALL SO SIMILAR
And now these Hitler-women are using dating apps to sex genocide all but the top 20% of men.
BOTH HITLER AND THE DATING APPS HAD AS A GOAL TO WEED OUT FROM EXISTANCE THE INFERIOR MEN
You may wonder how exactly not getting matches on Tinder is similar to being murdered in a death camp. Lifeisbullshit95 has this, er, answer:
WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? DYING IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER IS STILL DYING WE’RE THE VICTIMS OF THE NEW HOLOCAUST MY FRIENDS.
Okey dokey then.
You may wonder if any of the other incels stopped for a moment and told lifeisbullshit95 that he was completely full of shit. The answer, of course, is no.
“my face is rotting each day and female hypergamy is only getting potentialized with dating apps,” wrote someone calling himself JeffGoldblumInTheFly, and perhaps taking his handle a little too seriously, “its fucking over.”
“Dating apps and social media not only killed men but it make us suffer,” declared someone called Cuyen.
JeffGoldblum and Cuyen have, together, posted more than 20,000 messages on Incels.is, so I’m pretty sure they’re not drive-by trolls.
And even if JeffGoldblumInTheFly is joking about his face rotting away like, well, Jeff Goldblum’s face in “The Fly,” incels do believe that as each day passes they become ever less likely to ever validate their lives by having sex with a woman. More importantly, his comment here serves to offer its own sort of validation — of lifeisbullshit95’s hyperbolic, hateful rhetoric blaming women for essentially every problem in men’s lives.
Social media and dating apps don’t kill, but depression does, and sites like Incels.is add to the problem by steering young, desperate men away from real help and into a hateful, self-destructive fantasy world. That’s the real danger here.
We Hunted the Mammoth is independent and ad-free, and relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!
It’s PLEDGE DRIVE time again! WHTM is ad free and entirely dependent on folks like you for its continued existence. If you can afford it, please DONATE HERE NOW! Thanks!
By David Futrelle
The movie review-aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes has made some changes to its website that will prevent angry trolls from talking shit about movies none of them have seen, removing the ability of anyone but professional critics to review movies that aren’t out yet and shutting a feature that allowed users to report whether or not they want to see a movie that’s about to come out.
It was clearly a response to an organized downvoting campaign against Marvel and Disney’s upcoming Captain Marvel movie, which has angered the internet’s angriest men because it features a woman — Brie Larson — in the titular role. Trolls had apparently managed to push the film’s “want to see” rating down to 27% before the feature was disabled.
As Collider points out, this is hardly the first time angry dudes have tried to tank a movie at the box office with mass downvotes.
Over the last couple of years, it’s become commonplace for “fans” who have yet to see a movie to enact a negging campaign designed to bring down the film’s audience scores prior to release. The Ghostbusters “fans” did this by downvoting the trailer for Paul Feige’s female-led reboot [and] Marvel Studios “fans” intentionally tried to tank the Rotten Tomatoes score of Black Panther … .
Naturally, the trolls are pissed, and many have taken to Twitter to denounce Rotten Tomatoes for allegedly taking away the First Amendment rights of ordinary, hard-working Americans by preventing them from crapping on a movie they haven’t seen on one privately-owned website:
Indeed, the critics charge, the Rotten Tomatoites are apparently destroying democracy itself.
But what else would one expect from the gang of beta cuck feminazi fascist assholes who run Rotten Tomatoes?
According to this self-described Jordan Peterson fan, the “fucking fascist dictators” at Rotten Tomatoes have taken away his right to tell the world that he wants to see a different movie, although he has in fact told the world this in the very tweet in question:
The powers that be at Rotten Tomatoes are apparently a rather unique breed of Nazis in that they are also liberals:
They are also, apparently, fascists who hate white men. (Which would be sort of a new twist for fascism, I have to say.)
This fellow, with a Covington Kid avatar and zero followers, is also very much concerned about the rights of white men:
As is this fellow with nine followers:
And this lovely fellow with five followers and an Elon Musk avatar:
Evidently Rotten Tomatoes is not only racist against whites but also racist against everyone who isn’t white:
The brave free speech defenders made sure that their own personal free speech was filled with all the right angry internet dude buzzwords:
Other commenters leaned heavily on the slurs:
Some even made up their own slur just for the occasion, combining the name of the actress playing Captain Marvel (Brie Larson) with the old favorite “retard.”
Some of the criticism got weirdly specific. For example, these critics are angry that the people running Rotten Tomatoes are evidently too enthusiastic about performing oral sex:
As a result of Rotten Tomatoes’ actions, at least two white MALE asses will not be attending the movie.
This white man, thinking ahead, apparently plans to boycott a completely different Marvel movie coming out later this year:
Meanwhile, the same people who insisted they didn’t organize the mass-downvoting of Captain Marvel have evidently decided to organize a mass-upvoting of the movie Alita: Battle Angel — I guess to prove that angry manbabies don’t hate all superhero movies centered around women, at least not if the women in question have weird huge cgi-ed anime eyes.
So far these newly minted Alita superfans have pushed the Rotten Tomatoes audience score rating for that film up to 94% — a considerable improvement from the 59% score from critics.
So sad that these thoughtful critics and their assorted sockpuppets have been denied their sacred right to voice their opinions about a movie none of them have ever seen, at least on one particular site out of the gazillions of sites on the internet that would like its audience rating scores to actually reflect the views of the audience and not of angry mobs of woman-with-normal-eyes-hating trolls. I can only hope that free speech somehow manages to survive this assault.
(@jumpFloofs) 
![[It's Over] Social media and dating apps have killed more men than both world war combined](http://i1.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Captureyg9hu08ji-.png?fit=600%2C384)
